Visitor Evaluation

Visitor evaluation survey - Reinventing the City | Sustainable Urban Transformations.
From February 16 until 18, 2022, AMS Institute hosted its very first scientific conference. We are curious to know how you experienced this hybrid event, especially looking forward to the preparations for the next scientific conference. Thanks in advance!
How did you attend the conference?* (Up to 1)
Communication
We now have a few questions about communication from the organisation. Please rate these on a scale from very dissatisfied to very satisfied. Please use N/A if you don't have an opinion.
Emails received prior to the event*
How do you feel about the emails sent by the organisation prior to the event?
Quality of practical information on the conference website*
How do you feel about the quality of practical information on the conference website?
Quality of the full program online*
How do you feel about the quality of the full program online?
Quality of communication via social media (LinkedIn, Instagram)*
How do you feel about the quality of communication via social media (LinkedIn, Instagram)?
Is there something you would like to elaborate on regarding communication by the organisation?
Quality of the plenary morning program
We are curious to know how you would you rate the quality of the plenary morning program, if you visited these? On a scale from very dissatisfied to very satisfied. Please answer with N/A if you did not visit.
Plenary morning program day 1 - February 16th*
Opening Eveline van Leeuwen & Ger Baron, keynote by Carolyn Steel, discussion by Ard van de Kreeke, panel discussion with Eveline Buter, Sigrid Wertheim, Jan Duffhues.
Plenary morning program day 2 - February 17th*
Opening by Josja van der Veer, keynote by Wouter Veldhuis, reflection by Tjeerd Haccou, panel discussion with Sasha Stolp, Sanda Lenzholzer, Pablo van der Lugt & Albert Jan Kruiter.
Plenary morning program day 3 - February 18th*
Opening by Carolien Gehrels, keynote by Anna König Jerlymr, reflection by Carlo Ratti, panel discussion with Pepijn Duijvestein, Pallas Agterberg and Eefje Cuppen. The Next Steps with Eveline van Leeuwen, Caroline Nevejan, Emile Reiding and Titus Venverloo.
Is there something you would like to add, regarding the plenary morning program?
Quality of the afternoon program
We would also like to know a bit more about how you experienced the quality of the afternoon program.
Could you tell us how many sessions you visited (approximately)? *
How would you evaluate the quality of the paper presentation sessions?*
Please give an overall evaluation. If you did not visit, use the N/A option.
How would you evaluate the quality of the workshops?*
Please give an overall evaluation. If you did not visit, use the N/A option.
How would you evaluate the quality of the special sessions?*
Please give an overall evaluation. If you did not visit, use the N/A option.
Is there something you would like to add, regarding the afternoon program?*
Overall evaluation and suggestions
We would like to know how you experienced the conference as a whole, and are open to your suggestions.
What did you like most about the conference, which we should not change for the next?(Up to 100 Words)
If you should give us one main suggestion, what would it be?*(Up to 100 Words)
Thank you so much for your evaluation! It is highly appreciated.
Could you tell us a little bit more about you?
What is your organisation category? (Up to 2)
Use CTRL to select two.
Thank you so much!
Thank you for filling in our evaluation survey!
Calendar